Some
folks still don’t “get it.” The Council Meeting last night, followed by pundit
comments today, illustrates a very confused view of politics. Politics is very
different from Glee Club or a Church Picnic.
How it works
Let’s
review how elected government works – or is supposed to. First, a majority is
elected. That majority uses its power to select committees and advisers to
develop into a team. The team is selected that the majority believes can help them
reach their goals and meet their responsibilities.
That’s
like a new boss coming in and organizing the staff – new hires and long-term
employees – to get the job done. If the boss fails to meet his commitments he
loses his job. So he forms a team that works
toward his goals. He’d be a fool to hire people who disagree or won’t work with
him. Similarly, a mayor would fail his constituents if he filled responsible
positions with people who oppose him.
Appointment to Planning
Costa
Mesa’s Mayor and his majority appointed folks to the Planning Commission who
share their goals for a better Costa Mesa. That included Jim Fitzpatrick, who had
resigned from the Planning Commission in the past to serve as an elected
official on the Sanitation District Board.
Jim
got in a beef with the majority of the Sanitation directors for insisting on calling
for bids on the trash-hauling contract. He recently resigned from Sanitation
under pressure from a lawsuit by the rest of the board. (The Board didn't want
to spend money soliciting bids for the trash hauling contract, but did want to
spend public funds to pursue their grudge against Fitzpatrick. (See blogs
1/1/13 and 12/2712)).
He sounds like the kind of honest representative we want, right? Many of those who screamed about the dangers of “no bid contracts” posed by the proposed charter don’t like Fitzpatrick, though, so they’re angry that he was appointed.
He sounds like the kind of honest representative we want, right? Many of those who screamed about the dangers of “no bid contracts” posed by the proposed charter don’t like Fitzpatrick, though, so they’re angry that he was appointed.
Assignments as rewards
Another
factor in how politics works is the distribution of jobs. The Mayor makes
assignments for committees and task forces that further his goals and, second,
that reward those who work with him. Last night he did not give member Leece
the assignment she wanted. Remember that she was critical of him throughout the
recent election, although neither was a candidate. She willingly risked the
consequences to promote her opposition views.
However,
she was upset that, after gratuitously opposing Council majority members
throughout the campaign, she didn't receive their support for her preferred
Council assignment afterward.
Blogger still hates Righeimer
A
prominent blogger who’s been attacking Mensinger, Righeimer, and City growth for
many years chimed in. He opined that the appointments show Righeimer wasn't sincere about developing a collaborative approach to growing and improving
Costa Mesa.
Perhaps
the blogger and the Councilwoman are confusing politics with a Sunday school picnic.
The City Council is charged with effectively running a city that has millions
of dollars of income, expenditure, and infrastructure. The Council is not
charged with making everybody, or at least not their opposition – both competitive
and gratuitous – feel good.
Past mayor gets it
On
the other hand, although newly-elected Council Member Sandra Genis articulated
her views forcefully during the meeting, she demonstrated collaboration by
offering to make a vote unanimous. Mayor Righeimer commented on her
cooperation. We predict that, since she is demonstrating political savvy, she’s
likely to influence votes, get cooperation toward her goals, and support her
constituents well as a respected minority vote on the Council.
Repeat
Another
perennial opponent, Chris McEvoy,
returned to remind the audience that he was trying to get signatures for a
recall of Mayor Righeimer. His stated purpose in attempting the recall is a Council
vote about mitigation of effects in Costa Mesa for the Banning Ranch
development. The issue is moot, since the development, which isn't even in
Costa Mesa, has not been able to progress, and the agreement he cites hasn't been signed nor applied.
If we
look at this as a crude attempt to smear the Mayor, it demonstrates a
significant lack of understanding of law and politics. If we look at it as a
sincere attempt to punish one man for the majority vote of the Council last
year, we have to wonder why Mr. McEvoy can’t find something productive to
occupy himself.
Need Politics 101
This
leads to the question: shouldn't we have better Political Science education in
our schools?
Just
a little bit of thinking might help, too. Anyone who’s been in a position of
responsibility understands that a business, school, or City Council is formed
to accomplish change – and hopefully improvement. A difference in opinion about
how to make the change creates competition. Opposing the group that accumulates
the most votes (or departments, or budget) has consequences.
We
need more thinking, by informed minds, in Costa Mesa. We need fewer fingers
pointing and pundits pouting. We need fewer silly comments by Costa Mesans who
just want to hear (and see) themselves on TV.
Confused
Too
many Costa Mesans are confused about the reality of politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment