Against everything especially the Mayor
(They're anti- lots, including Huntington Beach desalination and Newport Beach’s
cooperation with Costa Mesa, and they're anti- the charter and most Costa Mesa committee
appointments and City projects.)
Things worth opposing
There
are unsavory aspects about Costa Mesa agencies that deserve some anger.
The
Sanitary District has an “evergreen” contract, automatically renewing without
competition. An audit revealed that the contractor, CR&R, is
not providing enough information to demonstrate that their pricing is “the best,”
as guaranteed in the contract. Trash customers pay an extra fee to sort out
recyclables from the trash, but the company will provide no information about
how much the recycling is worth. (Audit)
There
are also local school boards that have issued bonds which will cost taxpayers
up to 35 times the face value, called Capital Appreciation Bonds, or CABs. The
banks that issue and sell the bonds provided the political expertise to get the
bonds passed. That’s supposed to be illegal. (Bonds)
Give contracts to friends. . .
Some
local school districts issue a contract without bids and have the favored contractor
sue the city. A judge’s default order follows which forbids further opposition
to the contract. This gets around laws against “sole source” contracts. (Contracts) (About Cheating)
Do naysayers object?
What
have the naysayers said about the non-competitive trash contract? Nothing. What
about the sole source contracting for schools? Nothing. How about the misuse of
school bonds by skirting the law, the sole-source . . . No point in going on, the complainers
we hear from so often did not speak out against any of these travesties.
What arouses naysayers?
What
are these naysayers opposing right now?
Costa
Mesa’s Mayor wrote an accolade for the City’s CEO. But he didn't mention that
other City employees are doing without an automatic pay raise, and are contributing
more toward their own pensions.
Somehow that equates to a sub-rosa attempt to
fool the voters and malign the employees. Specifically, he says: (Commentary)
. . . The answer is simple: politics. Righeimer is hoping
everyone is asleep at the wheel so he can create Tom Hatch as some shining
beacon of sacrifice for the city when the reality is all Costa Mesa employees
have made significant concessions. Be careful you don’t choke on Righeimer’s
smoke screen.”
His point seems to be
that other employees have contributed to the City, too, so the Mayor is “dissing”
them by not commending them, too. The whiner insists that other employees’ weren't recognized in the Mayor's letter, as if that diminished Mr. Hatch’s contributions or negated the
Mayor’s praise.
The nay-sayers aren't for open and honest government as they claim; they are against the Mayor personally. They don't oppose probable impropriety in government; they oppose the Mayor and the Mayor
Pro tem.
No comments:
Post a Comment