Let’s look at why people “flame: hostile and
insulting interaction often involving the use of profanity or obscenity.” (The
range of insults and the number of those insulted have decreased in Costa Mesa since the
election.)
Three major influences could apply to local
flaming. First, it may be attempts at propaganda; repeating a lie often enough to
make it seem like the truth. Second, perhaps ignorance of facts and inability
to reason effectively lead to accepting what another posts as gospel. Or the
cause could be rooted in a psychological mechanism called “projection.”
Projection reduces anxiety
Psychological projection is a defense mechanism. It
is a way to reduce discomfort from a secondary emotion: A person feels hurt, and the secondary emotion,anger, follows. In anger he accuses whoever hurt him of socially undesirable
behavior, such as racism and comforts himself, “at least I’m not racist.”
Or, a person who steals may believe that everyone
is trying to steal from her, so she rationalizes she’s “just getting something
back.” As described by Dr. Sigmund Freud, pathological projection is used to control
personal guilt feelings.
Projection in comments
The projection in local blogs and comments that
we’ll consider today is seen in the gratuitous attacks on the Mayor and the Pro Tem.
Some of the attacks are “insider” based. Examples include using terms like “drinks
the Cool Aid,” referring to blindly believing a leader (Google Jim
Jones), Righeimer’s "lackeys," and labeling Pro Tem Mensinger a “bully.”
Since the attacks, per psychological theory,
reveal attackers’ fears about themselves, we know one reason those commenters
and bloggers insult Righeimer and Mensinger. It fits into the general area of their own jealousy, insecurity and low self-esteem.
Freud's theories of the subconscious
A possible cause is hypothesized deep beneath consciousness. For
example, one local blogger launches periodic hyperbole including “Deliverance-on-the-log”
fantasies. He uses speculation and creative labeling in a similar vein to attack other bloggers,
attempting to discredit them or at least to annoy them. Some attacks
appear as comments from pseudonyms after his post. The blog owner reiterates
often and strongly, though, that he, and only he, is responsible for everything
posted on his blog, even the comments.
Fear of personal aberrations figured in some of
Freud’s early writings about projection.
Ignorant and unthinking by choice
Next, some of the commenters may be parroting terms
and ideas without thinking about their likely truthfulness. For example, how
likely is it that a man with a strong religious faith – practiced – who’s a contributor
of time, money, and effort to helping those less fortunate, is using the Mayor’s
title to steal from City coffers directly or through bribes from contractors?
Or that the Pro Tem who has taught and modeled sportsmanship for many years is
likely to bully people?
Finally, some of the comments are probably just
knee-jerk efforts at propaganda – trying to change opinions through appeal to
emotion instead of by logical arguments using facts.
What else?
Please let me know what you think they might be.
No comments:
Post a Comment