We
watched three meetings this week and boy were they boring. Boring was a result
of organization and leadership – routine business conducted routinely. No drama
or pointless whining.
First, the study session
The
first meeting was a Council study of the budget. Costa Mesa’s “want” list of
projects exceeds our anticipated income by about $12 million due to needed
infrastructure updates. The money we must spend on infrastructure right now is
partly a result of ineptitude by previous Councils. Earlier Councils deferred
infrastructure maintenance and repair, such as road and alley and median care.
Now, we have to pay for catch up.

New and improved process
The
budget process used now in Costa Mesa works like this: first the City staff
lists “must pay” expenses like pension contributions. They must be paid. Next
it lists the “we'd better pay” costs like employee pay and utilities. We need to pay and keep our workforce to provide the services we expect in Costa Mesa.

Council professionals
There
were some astute observations and insightful questions, and the discussion
stayed on its timeline. Boring. No nay-sayers were heard complaining, opposing,
or belittling and there were few diversions of discussion onto unrelated
subjects. We had no speakers approving or disapproving (one must ask, who cares
whether you approve or not, what is your point?).
Mayor led
We'd attribute the efficient, organized and effective meeting to cooperation of the
City Council members and City staff. Remember that we've defined leadership as “inspiring
willing and enthusiastic cooperation in the accomplishment of a goal.” The
meeting’s professionalism and decorum – and “boringness” -- resulted from Mayor
Righeimer’s effective leadership.
Another meeting

Boring is not dull
Please don't read “boring” to mean “without disagreement.” Competent people with
different perspectives didn't necessarily agree in either meeting. However,
disagreement was fueled by logic and characterized by courtesy and respect. This
meeting’s success and decorum – and “boringness” -- would also have to be
attributed to good leadership. This time the accolades go to Chair Jim
Fitzpatrick.
Meet the Mayor

Mayor Righeimer solicited concerns, explained the whats and whys, and asked the
two Planning Commissioners present (Fitzpatrick and Sesler) to follow up on
specific complaints. This meeting could have been a textbook example of how to
reassure constituents and help them – and win their hearts and minds. A couple
of the questions were soliloquies by confused speakers: the Mayor kept the
meeting moving so that all concerns could be voiced.
Rumor control
Apparently some folks have been told that the City will close the Senior Center if the
corporation that runs it doesn’t behave. “Nothing could be farther from the
truth,” he said. “As long as I’m in office, and Pro Tem Mensinger, the Center
is there.”
The
Senior Center is owned by the City and run by a non-profit
corporation. If the corporation veers too far from City guidance, it can be replaced. The Center is not going to be closed in a pique of frustration about the corporation’s policy of demanding a $500 donation from every person appointed to their Board of Directors.
corporation. If the corporation veers too far from City guidance, it can be replaced. The Center is not going to be closed in a pique of frustration about the corporation’s policy of demanding a $500 donation from every person appointed to their Board of Directors.
Since the City provides much of the funding to the Center, it doesn’t
want those who the Council appoints to be subject to this requirement. This
will shake out over time.
Can't stop camping -- yet

“Why
the charter didn’t pass” offered a great opportunity to blame the Union money
spent in Costa Mesa. Instead the Mayor assumed the blame for not getting more
community support in his rush to stop bleeding cash from Costa Mesa to
Sacramento. He said he may have over-reached in setting the scope of the
charter. In short, when something fails, a leader determines where HE failed,
gets up and goes back to work. (Compare that to Jack Welch at General Electric,
who exemplified the concept, and to members of our present National
administration, who don’t.)
Three meetings, all run professionally
So,
we had three meetings that included a substantial amount of disagreement, but
which were all run efficiently and well. Good leadership, transparency of
government operations – and gifts at the “Meet the Mayor.” Mayor Pro Tempore
Steve Mensinger and Mayor Righeimer’s daughters distributed Tees and hats to
those who asked questions.
Boring,
but refreshing. We're starting to do the right things the right way in Costa
Mesa.
No comments:
Post a Comment